The ABC/Facebook Presedential Debates: Good Debates, Not Much Facebook

For four hours last night, ABC provided a continuous broadcast of Republican and Democratic debates live from New Hampshire. Late last year we saw the YouTube/CNN debates that enabled YouTube users to present questions directly to the presidential candidates. While filtered, it was the first time that web technology was so tightly integrated with the debates. Whether or not you think YouTube was integrated into the debates effectively it illustrated the ubiquity of the YouTube brand.

Last night, it was not just ABC covering the New Hampshire debates. It was instead ABC and Facebook presented boldly on the stage and on the televised event’s pre-roll. It spoke to the ubiquity of Facebook. A powerful statement. Overall for Facebook, the event appeared to be little more than a statement and a highly active application on their site. At the end of the debates, the program cut to an ABC staff member who gave a summary of how the debates were shaping out on Facebook.

She proceeded to cherry pick random statements that users has submitted and stated that Facebook users wanted to hear more about the economy from each of the candidates. That was it! They cut back to the normal broadcast at which point the announcer paraphrased the ABC staff member about Facebook users wanting to hear more about the economy and continued with the show.

It appeared as though the ABC staff member was experiencing information overload in trying to summarize what the Facebook users were saying. Rightfully so. As Anne Broache points out, there were over 35,000 comments posted by Facebook users. A staggering number that illustrates how the ABC staff had no chance of effectively filtering the content in such a short amount of time.

This was the first time though and when the partnership was first announced, Facebook painted the partnership as more of an experiment then anything else. A good experiment it was. Maybe next time there will be a higher level of integration between Facebook and the debate. For now I think this was a great first step and it was powerful to see Facebook’s name branded on the debates. Do you think this was a good level of integration?

The AllFacebook Marketing Conference 2012 Returns to San Francisco

Mediabistro Event

The AllFacebook Marketing Conference is back in San Francisco on June 28-29. Join us for our second conference that offers a how-to guide for marketing to Facebook’s 800 million users. Special early pricing is available for only $249 until February 15, so register today. A full agenda will be announced soon. Keep an eye on our event site for more information

8837 Comments2008-01-06+19%3A12%3A37Nick+O%27Neill »

Personally I thought it was a bit ironic that a company who had spent the week defending/arguing its ability to quite undemocratically delete a person account and all their collected data to be a sponsor of perhaps one of the oldest democratic institutions we have …(http://tinyurl.com/2ggux3)

Comment by Jimmy — January 6, 2008 @ 9:21 am
Personally I thought it was a bit ironic that a company who had spent the week defending/arguing its ability to quite undemocratically delete a person account and all their collected data to be a sponsor of perhaps one of the oldest democratic institutions we have …

(http://tinyurl.com/2ggux3)

Comment by Jimmy — January 6, 2008 @ 10:21 am
Of course it wasn't a good integration.A "Facebook" debate would work well if done similarly to the youtube debate. Have people submit questions before and during the debate. Have a ranking system working in real time that lets users bump the best questions to the top of the heap. The realtime nature of the system could allow followup questions to be quickly thrown back at a candidate later in the same debate.Apply instant community judgements of candidate responses. If a guy avoids a question and gives an irrelevant response, in the judgement of the community, have a big neon sign come up somewhere that says, "Avoiding the question!"And since it's facebook, it'd be interesting to use the social graph somehow. Sure, you could have it show a user what his friends are saying, but I'm not sure how a social effect would get to the candidates…

Comment by Charlie — January 6, 2008 @ 10:21 am
Of course it wasn't a good integration.

A "Facebook" debate would work well if done similarly to the youtube debate. Have people submit questions before and during the debate. Have a ranking system working in real time that lets users bump the best questions to the top of the heap. The realtime nature of the system could allow followup questions to be quickly thrown back at a candidate later in the same debate.

Apply instant community judgements of candidate responses. If a guy avoids a question and gives an irrelevant response, in the judgement of the community, have a big neon sign come up somewhere that says, "Avoiding the question!"

And since it's facebook, it'd be interesting to use the social graph somehow. Sure, you could have it show a user what his friends are saying, but I'm not sure how a social effect would get to the candidates…

Comment by Charlie — January 6, 2008 @ 11:21 am
I just laughed when I saw Facebook logo on tv.. That was jokes..

Comment by Yatti — January 6, 2008 @ 12:33 pm
I just laughed when I saw Facebook logo on tv.. That was jokes..

Comment by Yatti — January 6, 2008 @ 4:33 pm
[...] As it turns out… I’m not alone. [...]

Pingback by ABC/Facebook experiment lacking, but on the right track — January 6, 2008 @ 9:36 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Personally I thought it was a bit ironic that a company who had spent the week defending/arguing its ability to quite undemocratically delete a person account and all their collected data to be a sponsor of perhaps one of the oldest democratic institutions we have …(http://tinyurl.com/2ggux3)

Comment by Jimmy — January 6, 2008 @ 9:21 am

(http://tinyurl.com/2ggux3)

Comment by Jimmy — January 6, 2008 @ 10:21 am

Of course it wasn't a good integration.A "Facebook" debate would work well if done similarly to the youtube debate. Have people submit questions before and during the debate. Have a ranking system working in real time that lets users bump the best questions to the top of the heap. The realtime nature of the system could allow followup questions to be quickly thrown back at a candidate later in the same debate.Apply instant community judgements of candidate responses. If a guy avoids a question and gives an irrelevant response, in the judgement of the community, have a big neon sign come up somewhere that says, "Avoiding the question!"And since it's facebook, it'd be interesting to use the social graph somehow. Sure, you could have it show a user what his friends are saying, but I'm not sure how a social effect would get to the candidates…

Comment by Charlie — January 6, 2008 @ 10:21 am

Of course it wasn't a good integration.

A "Facebook" debate would work well if done similarly to the youtube debate. Have people submit questions before and during the debate. Have a ranking system working in real time that lets users bump the best questions to the top of the heap. The realtime nature of the system could allow followup questions to be quickly thrown back at a candidate later in the same debate.

Apply instant community judgements of candidate responses. If a guy avoids a question and gives an irrelevant response, in the judgement of the community, have a big neon sign come up somewhere that says, "Avoiding the question!"

And since it's facebook, it'd be interesting to use the social graph somehow. Sure, you could have it show a user what his friends are saying, but I'm not sure how a social effect would get to the candidates…

Comment by Charlie — January 6, 2008 @ 11:21 am

I just laughed when I saw Facebook logo on tv.. That was jokes..

Comment by Yatti — January 6, 2008 @ 12:33 pm

Comment by Yatti — January 6, 2008 @ 4:33 pm

[...] As it turns out… I’m not alone. [...]

Pingback by ABC/Facebook experiment lacking, but on the right track — January 6, 2008 @ 9:36 pm