Welcome New Reader!

To stay up to date with all news, analysis, and security tips related to Facebook, complete these 2 quick steps:

Facebook the Capitalist Pig

Last night Mark Zuckerberg was quoted for saying that “beacon makes Facebook less commercial.” Immediately, there were a number of people including Duncan Riley who said that this was probably the dumbest thing Zuckerberg could have said. The reality is that Beacon does in fact make Facebook more commercial. I understand that Zuckerberg most likely meant that it makes Facebook less commercial than competing social networks but it didn’t come off that way.

Today, Tom Hodgkinson proclaimed that he despises Facebook. He has a point. On the other hand, Hodgkinson says that the Facebook backers “have a clearly thought out ideology that they are hoping to spread around the world.” Suddenly Facebook has become a conduit for spreading capitalist ideology. I think that may be a side effect of the site but to suggest that the intentions of the founders and backers is to spread capitalism is a bit ridiculous.

Isn’t capitalism inherently viral? I mean if you think about it, vanity is somewhat viral as well. Whoa, maybe I should avoid having this turn into a communist blog. Hodgkinson has concluded that Peter Thiel is using Facebook to spread a mix of neo-conservative and libertarian values thanks to his affiliations with TheVanguard.org. Hodgkinson continues,

Clearly, Facebook is another uber-capitalist experiment: can you make money out of friendship? Can you create communities free of national boundaries – and then sell Coca-Cola to them? Facebook is profoundly uncreative. It makes nothing at all. It simply mediates in relationships that were happening anyway.

On and on Hodgkinson goes, where he stops nobody uh … well he actually stops at the end of the article but you know what I mean. The article winds up twisting into a regurgitation of the Facebook conspiracy theory that we’ve heard before connecting the dots back to In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital company. Hodgkinson does have reason to be concerned and I can speak from experience when I say that there is an interesting feeling floating around these Facebook conferences.

Ultimately we have a lot of technically savvy individuals (myself included) helping to promote the growth of the largest personal information database in the world. Is this wrong? I don’t think so. I think we have much more to gain from the system but that comes from an unspoken trust I have in the Facebook organization. Hodgkinson claims “We are seeing the commodification of human relationships, the extraction of capitalistic value from friendships.”

Yet again, is this wrong? I don’t think so. Some people choose to stare aimlessly into their televisions (sometimes I do as well) and that’s how advertisers reached their audience. Facebook caters to our desire to spend much of our time connecting with other people. Why shouldn’t they make money from that? Facebook will continue to try and cross the line and it is our duty to constantly question their actions the same way we do of any other company and even the government.

Facebook has the power to do plenty of good through helping us maintain relationships and foster new ones. Information can always be used for good or bad. We should hold these companies to high standards and for the most part that should theoretically result in a net positive effect. Do you think Facebook will conquer the world and help big brother monitor us? Doesn’t big brother via court order (where we are not present to defend our rights) already have access to most of our private information?

 



Recommended Articles


Inside Social Apps 2012 is Less Than Two Weeks Away

Inside Social Apps, held on February 8-9 in San Francisco, is less than two weeks away. This is the third conference on the future of monetization on social and mobile platforms. Leaders from the industry will share their views on today's most formidable challenges affecting social and mobile apps and games in 2012. Inside Social Apps conferences sell out in advance, so take advantage of early registration pricing. Early bird rates end on February 1, so register today.

10 Comments »

  1. It's very, very stupid.Facebook is not selling us human relationships, it is GIVING us a tool to enhance them, paid for by sponsors.How about Air Lines that fly us to see our loved ones. Are they selling us our family?How about the food store that sells us the food we need to eat to survive. Are they selling us our own lives?Everything is a commodity. Such is capitalism. Take it or leave it, Hodgkinson.

    Comment by Jonathan Kleiman — January 14, 2008 @ 12:35 pm

  2. It's not very stupid. It's a good discussion to have: if Facebook has the potential to match the hype, then it can be as detrimental as it could be positive. My take, however, is that Facebook is much more limited in its potential than everyone makes it out to be. Facebook communication is not the same as real world communication. It is low fidelity, degraded, and cheap. My friends on Facebook are not my real friends, and my messages on Facebook will never be as valuable to me as a telephone call, or a real birthday card. If Facebook truly 'enhances' human relationships, then I should have more and better friends the more I use Facebook. I think it's actually the opposite.

    Comment by Anonymous — January 14, 2008 @ 12:49 pm

  3. It's very, very stupid.

    Facebook is not selling us human relationships, it is GIVING us a tool to enhance them, paid for by sponsors.

    How about Air Lines that fly us to see our loved ones. Are they selling us our family?

    How about the food store that sells us the food we need to eat to survive. Are they selling us our own lives?

    Everything is a commodity. Such is capitalism. Take it or leave it, Hodgkinson.

    Comment by Jonathan Kleiman — January 14, 2008 @ 1:35 pm

  4. It's not very stupid. It's a good discussion to have: if Facebook has the potential to match the hype, then it can be as detrimental as it could be positive. My take, however, is that Facebook is much more limited in its potential than everyone makes it out to be. Facebook communication is not the same as real world communication. It is low fidelity, degraded, and cheap. My friends on Facebook are not my real friends, and my messages on Facebook will never be as valuable to me as a telephone call, or a real birthday card. If Facebook truly 'enhances' human relationships, then I should have more and better friends the more I use Facebook. I think it's actually the opposite.

    Comment by Anonymous — January 14, 2008 @ 1:49 pm

  5. "Suddenly Facebook has become a conduit for spreading capitalist ideology" We can only hope so. If it is, it will serve as a monumental achievement. It will lift millions out of poverty, bring freedom and choice to billions, and improve the quality of life for all of us.Spread-on Facebook…

    Comment by Jon N — January 14, 2008 @ 8:58 pm

  6. "Suddenly Facebook has become a conduit for spreading capitalist ideology"

    We can only hope so. If it is, it will serve as a monumental achievement. It will lift millions out of poverty, bring freedom and choice to billions, and improve the quality of life for all of us.

    Spread-on Facebook…

    Comment by Jon N — January 14, 2008 @ 9:58 pm

  7. Anonymous said:

    "My friends on Facebook are not my real friends"

    That's a choice you made, and that's all that Facebook provides. I choose to only accept friend requests from people who are actually my friends (or at the very least, acquaintances) in real life. You've chosen to include a much broader group.

    Comment by Jon N — January 14, 2008 @ 10:03 pm

  8. Anonymous said:
    “My friends on Facebook are not my real friends”

    That's a choice you made, and that's all that Facebook provides. I choose to only accept friend requests from people who are actually my friends (or at the very least, acquaintances) in real life. You've chosen to include a much broader group.

    Comment by Jon N — January 15, 2008 @ 1:03 am

  9. [...] be soaring right about now. Their $15 billion valuation may be overblown but then again, they are capitalist pigs. How much more money can Facebook take in? Posted in News Digg this article Save to [...]

    Pingback by Other Investors Put Money in Facebook - The Unofficial Facebook Blog — January 15, 2008 @ 1:33 pm

  10. [...] En All Facebook han tenido su correspondiente réplica con tintes de apología. [...]

    Pingback by Rosa J.C. » Blog Archive » El lado oscuro de facebook — January 15, 2008 @ 5:06 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Send us a Tip

tips@allfacebook.com
[Inside Social Apps 2012]
[AllFacebook Stats: Facebook Analytics for Your Business]
[How can Facebook change your business?]

Upcoming Events

Inside Social Apps

February 8-9, 2012 | San Francisco

Inside Social Apps

Developing & monetizing on social & mobile platforms

Social Gaming Summit

23-24 May, 2012 | Berlin

Social Gaming Summit

Where Gaming Meets the Social Web

AllFacebook Marketing Conference

June 28-29, 2012 | San Francisco

AllFacebook Marketing Conference

Your how-to guide for Facebook marketing.