There has been an ongoing debate about whether or not Palestine should be considered a network on Facebook. Just last week at South by Southwest, one audience member questioned Mark Zuckerberg about the lack of a Palestinian network. He replied that Facebook acknowledges territories based on what the United States considers territories. Since then, Palenstine mysteriously appeared as a network and some West Bank Jewish settlements are up in arms about their hometown being automatically listed as “Palestine.”
According to Joseph Nasr, Brandee Barker of Facebook said that “users living in major settlement blocs can now choose between being listed as residents of Israel or Palestine.” There are a number of groups that have now been created on both sides of the deabte. Some have protested that they will leave Facebook if Palestine is removed as a network while others are arguing that Palestine is not a country.
I’m not quite sure when Palestine was added as a network to the site but this addition will surely spark controversy from both ends. While Facebook may never have intended to be an active participant in politics, it has found itself in an increasing number of conflicts including Colombia where Facebook has been used to to protest the Farc. The further that Facebook distances themselves from political issues, the better.
Facebook needs to focus on building highly efficient communication systems rather than dabble with politics. No matter how hard they try it appears as though Facebook is never too far from controversy.
![[Inside Social Apps 2012]](http://www.allfacebook.com/wordpress/wp-content/themes/allfacebook2/images/ISA2012_336x100_F_RegisterNow.gif)
![[AllFacebook Stats: Facebook Analytics for Your Business]](http://www.allfacebook.com/wordpress/wp-content/themes/allfacebook2/images/stpro_allfacebookstats.gif)
![[How can Facebook change your business?]](http://www.allfacebook.com/wordpress/wp-content/themes/allfacebook2/images/FMB_A_MAY2011_336x100_F.gif)
Letting people associate with the network they consider themselves to be a part of seems like the best approach…
Comment by Charlie — March 17, 2008 @ 9:48 am
I'm left wondering how Facebook can avoid these international debates. Social networks transcend borders. Their very nature is much too large to avoid these things.
This is a new type of problem, one that they have to face. It can't be avoided.
For me, I say let people choose between Palestine and Israel. If you limit people to one choice, you're shutting out a whole group of people and their identity.
Comment by Jonathan Trenn — March 17, 2008 @ 9:53 am
I'm left wondering how Facebook can avoid these international debates. Social networks transcend borders. Their very nature is much too large to avoid these things. This is a new type of problem, one that they have to face. It can't be avoided.For me, I say let people choose between Palestine and Israel. If you limit people to one choice, you're shutting out a whole group of people and their identity.
Comment by Jonathan Trenn — March 17, 2008 @ 9:53 am
I don't understand what the big deal here is.
The way I see it, you're the one starting to dabble with politics with this blog post.
Comment by Jad — March 17, 2008 @ 11:59 am
I don't understand what the big deal here is.The way I see it, you're the one starting to dabble with politics with this blog post.
Comment by Jad — March 17, 2008 @ 11:59 am
@Jad, I'm simply covering the story. I've touched on politics previously and its relation to Facebook.
Comment by Nick O'Neill — March 17, 2008 @ 1:39 pm
@Jad, I'm simply covering the story. I've touched on politics previously and its relation to Facebook.
Comment by Nick O'Neill — March 17, 2008 @ 1:39 pm
Letting people associate with the network they consider themselves to be a part of seems like the best approach…
Comment by Charlie — March 17, 2008 @ 1:48 pm
Hello,
Well, my 2 cents. Google has it on its country list, Paypal has it, BBC has it, even some Israeli websites have some delivery option to Palestinian territories.. I believe it must be there, that's away from me being a Palestinian myself in this situation.
I agree with Charlie, the 1st commenter mentioning that any user, despite where he/she os from; have the right to be attached to any network he/she feels being a part of. Even if that involves a new group of 'Lunatics' to ask for some 'Moon' network to be created for them.
Anyway, Its not me making the decision, wisdom Facebook, wisdom.
Comment by Ruslan Abuzant — March 17, 2008 @ 8:40 pm
Hello, Well, my 2 cents. Google has it on its country list, Paypal has it, BBC has it, even some Israeli websites have some delivery option to Palestinian territories.. I believe it must be there, that's away from me being a Palestinian myself in this situation. I agree with Charlie, the 1st commenter mentioning that any user, despite where he/she os from; have the right to be attached to any network he/she feels being a part of. Even if that involves a new group of 'Lunatics' to ask for some 'Moon' network to be created for them.Anyway, Its not me making the decision, wisdom Facebook, wisdom.
Comment by Ruslan Abuzant — March 17, 2008 @ 8:40 pm
[...] controversy popping up on Facebook. Just the other day I touched on the topic of Facebook being involved in mideast drama as it pertained to Israel and Palestine. Yesterday I saw another article about how debate over the [...]
Pingback by Facebook as a Platform for Political Debate - The Unofficial Facebook Blog — March 20, 2008 @ 11:34 am
Thanks for sharingRegardsMaxhttp://thenewsempire.com/Sport/
Comment by nulls101 — October 16, 2008 @ 10:28 am