Comments on: Mark Zuckerberg, Sarah Lacy Interview Video

By: moron

moron — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:38:20 +0000

Wow, zuckerberg is an moron. Could he overuse “communicate efficiently”, and “empathy relationships” any more? And what is up with this typical “arrogant/nerdy IT crowd”. Typical.

By: moron

moron — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:38:20 +0000

Wow, zuckerberg is an moron. Could he overuse “communicate efficiently”, and “empathy relationships” any more? And what is up with this typical “arrogant/nerdy IT crowd”. Typical.

By: Flatulance

Flatulance — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:40:40 +0000

I was there and she was bad, period.

She flirted with him the entire time. She talked over him and cut him off. She tried to hype her book and her career. She asked the same question multiple times despite the fact that he continued to give the same answer. She tried to embarrass him. She made bad jokes like threatening to throw water at him. SHE FAILED TO RECOGNIZE HER AUDIENCE AND ADAPT DURING THE COURSE OF THE INTERVIEW!

People were literally groaning when she asked him about the 15 Billion valuation the second time. She still asked it again later on. She was bad, it doesn’t make her a bad person, just a bad journalist in this particular occasion.

I think 80% of her questions led to the response “We want to help people communicate effectively”. Maybe ask some other questions?

Obviously just watching the video doesn’t do it justice. When you hear something was bad you expect blood. It’s no different than hearing a movie is amazing and then hating a good movie because it wasn’t the best thing you’ve ever seen. You had to be there to get a true sense of how bad it really went.

By: Flatulance

Flatulance — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:40:40 +0000

I was there and she was bad, period.

I think 80% of her questions led to the response “We want to help people communicate effectively”. Maybe ask some other questions?

By: ELAURANCE

ELAURANCE — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:39:04 +0000

what the hell is all the negative buzz about? if it wasn’t for several of her direct and sometimes challenging questions, then this entire piece (interview and issue) would be one big yawn…Zuckerberg obviously has a problem speaking beyond anything other than canned, boring talking points. We all cn likely presume where these are coming from…Again, her questions, notwithstanding the casual demeanor (twirling of hair, etc.), clearly challenged him AND more importantly spoke to relevant business/industry questions and issues. I can see why Facebook/Z-berg groupies would have a problem with this however…get over it and get off her back..I’m all for challenging icons…they’re big enough to become and be icons, let them be big enough to handle this woman’s simple, relevant and straight-forward questions…

By: ELAURANCE

ELAURANCE — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:39:04 +0000

By: Cheap Webhosts

Cheap Webhosts — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:30:50 +0000

There were instances that Sarah Lacy showed no interest in what Mark was saying. The one who is conducting an interview must at all times focus to the person he or she is talking to.

By: Cheap Webhosts

Cheap Webhosts — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:30:50 +0000

There were instances that Sarah Lacy showed no interest in what Mark was saying. The one who is conducting an interview must at all times focus to the person he or she is talking to.

By: Jack

Jack — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:42:07 +0000

Her body language and casualness was not at all professional. Her approach as an interviewer was mortifying (not sitting upright in her chair? c’mon). She has a lot to learn. She seems like a 12 y/o doing a grown-up job.

By: Jack

Jack — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:42:07 +0000