Comments on: Fashion Facebook Fun http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/ The Unofficial Facebook Blog - Facebook News and More! Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:16:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Maggy Yong http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-7613 Maggy Yong Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:39:42 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-7613 I thought 'undeserved' was a typing error & 'underserved' was meant. A clarification might be in order. I notice that you have not mentioned the F/bk. deal with Nokia which is likely to bring some huge returns. As to 'who next?' - a popular tv series ? Bebo is going that way. I thought ‘undeserved’ was a typing error & ‘underserved’ was meant. A clarification might be in order.
I notice that you have not mentioned the F/bk. deal with Nokia which is likely to bring some huge returns.
As to ‘who next?’ - a popular tv series ? Bebo is going that way.

]]> By: Maggy Yong http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-12480 Maggy Yong Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:39:42 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-12480 I thought 'undeserved' was a typing error & 'underserved' was meant. A clarification might be in order. <br>I notice that you have not mentioned the F/bk. deal with Nokia which is likely to bring some huge returns. <br>As to 'who next?' - a popular tv series ? Bebo is going that way. I thought ‘undeserved’ was a typing error & ‘underserved’ was meant. A clarification might be in order.
I notice that you have not mentioned the F/bk. deal with Nokia which is likely to bring some huge returns.
As to ‘who next?’ - a popular tv series ? Bebo is going that way.

]]> By: Jonathan Kleiman http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-7576 Jonathan Kleiman Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:04:01 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-7576 A trip to london with no flight "worth £140" is no trip at all Also, I see no evidence of the corporate involvement of either Vogue or Facebook, nor of their cooperation Channel 4 is the sponsor of the event, and the presence on facebook is merely an unsponsored group A trip to london with no flight “worth £140″ is no trip at all

Also, I see no evidence of the corporate involvement of either Vogue or Facebook, nor of their cooperation

Channel 4 is the sponsor of the event, and the presence on facebook is merely an unsponsored group

]]> By: Charlie http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-7575 Charlie Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:17:53 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-7575 Now now, you may not like a particular product or service, and that's fine, but isn't it a little petty to call its user base "undeserved"? :) Now now, you may not like a particular product or service, and that’s fine, but isn’t it a little petty to call its user base “undeserved”?
:)

]]> By: Jonathan Kleiman http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-12479 Jonathan Kleiman Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:04:01 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-12479 A trip to london with no flight "worth £140" is no trip at all<br><br>Also, I see no evidence of the corporate involvement of either Vogue or Facebook, nor of their cooperation<br><br>Channel 4 is the sponsor of the event, and the presence on facebook is merely an unsponsored group A trip to london with no flight “worth £140″ is no trip at all

Also, I see no evidence of the corporate involvement of either Vogue or Facebook, nor of their cooperation

Channel 4 is the sponsor of the event, and the presence on facebook is merely an unsponsored group

]]> By: Charlie http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-12478 Charlie Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:17:53 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/fashion-facebook-fun/#comment-12478 Now now, you may not like a particular product or service, and that's fine, but isn't it a little petty to call its user base "undeserved"?<br>:) Now now, you may not like a particular product or service, and that’s fine, but isn’t it a little petty to call its user base “undeserved”?
:)

]]>