<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Adds Flash&#8230; Am I Excited?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Facebook Blog - Facebook News and More!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nulls101</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-16199</link>
		<dc:creator>nulls101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-16199</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Logan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xtonlinegame.com"&gt;http://xtonlinegame.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>Logan<br /><a href="http://xtonlinegame.com">http://xtonlinegame.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-15090</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-15090</guid>
		<description>I usually don&#39;t like Flash, except in movies (Youtube) or online games.&lt;br&gt;A website completely bound to Flash is just unusable, from my point of view.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About the autoplay, I might be wrong, but when you open a Youtube video  from Youtube webstie (isn&#39;t made with Flash?), it starts automatically. And the same happens with other movie sites or online games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually don&#39;t like Flash, except in movies (Youtube) or online games.<br />A website completely bound to Flash is just unusable, from my point of view.</p>
<p>About the autoplay, I might be wrong, but when you open a Youtube video  from Youtube webstie (isn&#39;t made with Flash?), it starts automatically. And the same happens with other movie sites or online games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-9897</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 08:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-9897</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;The Web is a collection of linked Hypertext documents...

True, but the days of Lynx and VT100's are also thankfully long gone.  While no one wants to see facebook slide into a Myspace-style mess, facebook is all about communication, and if Flash offers an additional tool to do so, then it's use is a good thing here.  Really, what it brings to the table is video.  And has been pointed out, there are plenty o' crappy non-Flash applications to pollute pages with already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;The Web is a collection of linked Hypertext documents&#8230;</p>
<p>True, but the days of Lynx and VT100&#8217;s are also thankfully long gone.  While no one wants to see facebook slide into a Myspace-style mess, facebook is all about communication, and if Flash offers an additional tool to do so, then it&#8217;s use is a good thing here.  Really, what it brings to the table is video.  And has been pointed out, there are plenty o&#8217; crappy non-Flash applications to pollute pages with already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikie</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-9557</link>
		<dc:creator>mikie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-9557</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with alan...
Facebook already looks a mess. I stopped looking at peoples pages long ago, but I do use 1 or 2 select apps now and then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with alan&#8230;<br />
Facebook already looks a mess. I stopped looking at peoples pages long ago, but I do use 1 or 2 select apps now and then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-8288</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-8288</guid>
		<description>This will most likely leak to the rest of Facebook. The student populace of Facebook has already become a mass of fancy little windows and applications that, for the most part, are of little use or have any practicality. I can open a friend's site right now, and scroll for a good thirty seconds before I find the communication tool. I have the good fortune of discovering what quizzes she took, the little pictures she finds humorous or meaningful, at least four different music players, and more crap to come as I scroll up and down - up and down trying simply to find the communication tool carefully hidden within the rest of the Vegas-like site.

I would prefer the flash actually. At least then there could be some more interesting applications. I would imagine that there would be a flood of incredibly useless and annoying ones as well, but like I stated above, that seems to be the current case anyways. Bring it on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will most likely leak to the rest of Facebook. The student populace of Facebook has already become a mass of fancy little windows and applications that, for the most part, are of little use or have any practicality. I can open a friend&#8217;s site right now, and scroll for a good thirty seconds before I find the communication tool. I have the good fortune of discovering what quizzes she took, the little pictures she finds humorous or meaningful, at least four different music players, and more crap to come as I scroll up and down - up and down trying simply to find the communication tool carefully hidden within the rest of the Vegas-like site.</p>
<p>I would prefer the flash actually. At least then there could be some more interesting applications. I would imagine that there would be a flood of incredibly useless and annoying ones as well, but like I stated above, that seems to be the current case anyways. Bring it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-12411</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-12411</guid>
		<description>This will most likely leak to the rest of Facebook. The student populace of Facebook has already become a mass of fancy little windows and applications that, for the most part, are of little use or have any practicality. I can open a friend's site right now, and scroll for a good thirty seconds before I find the communication tool. I have the good fortune of discovering what quizzes she took, the little pictures she finds humorous or meaningful, at least four different music players, and more crap to come as I scroll up and down - up and down trying simply to find the communication tool carefully hidden within the rest of the Vegas-like site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would prefer the flash actually. At least then there could be some more interesting applications. I would imagine that there would be a flood of incredibly useless and annoying ones as well, but like I stated above, that seems to be the current case anyways. Bring it on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will most likely leak to the rest of Facebook. The student populace of Facebook has already become a mass of fancy little windows and applications that, for the most part, are of little use or have any practicality. I can open a friend&#8217;s site right now, and scroll for a good thirty seconds before I find the communication tool. I have the good fortune of discovering what quizzes she took, the little pictures she finds humorous or meaningful, at least four different music players, and more crap to come as I scroll up and down - up and down trying simply to find the communication tool carefully hidden within the rest of the Vegas-like site.</p>
<p>I would prefer the flash actually. At least then there could be some more interesting applications. I would imagine that there would be a flood of incredibly useless and annoying ones as well, but like I stated above, that seems to be the current case anyways. Bring it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-8039</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-8039</guid>
		<description>Any web-based technology implemented with thought and experience is well delivered. Flash provides a well entwined method to distribute amazing visuals, integrated server-side benefits and compelling user experiences.

Auto-loading any content should be the choice of the end-user, consumer and well thought out by the developers providing the infrastructure by which Flash &#38; Facebook will integrate and deliver additional rich content to Facebook users.

All businesses want their consumers to experience compelling user-experiences. In this case Flash implemented with thought and experience will do this and Anthony LaFauce, it will not end up in the realm of dancing hamsters and flying toasters.

The auto click will arrive, but with hast Maggy. An intuitive thought sends "Flashes" of user preference by default to halt the auto load, otherwise where used with Facebook Pages. Isn't this already happening? Or are we all falling short envisioning Facebooks subtle enhancements and handling of web-technological biases.

Micahael White, I think that Flash does not enclose the user into a little dead-end world (to be frank) I feel that there is no reason why any links within a page can not be integrated into a Flash application. Look at it like this, if you are travelling along a highway and stop at a Flashy garage to refuel; restock, be informed, entertained, overwhelmed and enlightened. Well - you're in your own little world, well at least until you get back onto the highway. It's not a moment of, I only want - and don't want this - or that.

That is a little biased, and with Facebooks new and improved use of autoloading regarding Flash, that garage is open if you want it to be, when you want it to be, and where you want it to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any web-based technology implemented with thought and experience is well delivered. Flash provides a well entwined method to distribute amazing visuals, integrated server-side benefits and compelling user experiences.</p>
<p>Auto-loading any content should be the choice of the end-user, consumer and well thought out by the developers providing the infrastructure by which Flash &amp; Facebook will integrate and deliver additional rich content to Facebook users.</p>
<p>All businesses want their consumers to experience compelling user-experiences. In this case Flash implemented with thought and experience will do this and Anthony LaFauce, it will not end up in the realm of dancing hamsters and flying toasters.</p>
<p>The auto click will arrive, but with hast Maggy. An intuitive thought sends &#8220;Flashes&#8221; of user preference by default to halt the auto load, otherwise where used with Facebook Pages. Isn&#8217;t this already happening? Or are we all falling short envisioning Facebooks subtle enhancements and handling of web-technological biases.</p>
<p>Micahael White, I think that Flash does not enclose the user into a little dead-end world (to be frank) I feel that there is no reason why any links within a page can not be integrated into a Flash application. Look at it like this, if you are travelling along a highway and stop at a Flashy garage to refuel; restock, be informed, entertained, overwhelmed and enlightened. Well - you&#8217;re in your own little world, well at least until you get back onto the highway. It&#8217;s not a moment of, I only want - and don&#8217;t want this - or that.</p>
<p>That is a little biased, and with Facebooks new and improved use of autoloading regarding Flash, that garage is open if you want it to be, when you want it to be, and where you want it to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-12410</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-12410</guid>
		<description>Any web-based technology implemented with thought and experience is well delivered. Flash provides a well entwined method to distribute amazing visuals, integrated server-side benefits and compelling user experiences.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Auto-loading any content should be the choice of the end-user, consumer and well thought out by the developers providing the infrastructure by which Flash &#38; Facebook will integrate and deliver additional rich content to Facebook users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All businesses want their consumers to experience compelling user-experiences. In this case Flash implemented with thought and experience will do this and Anthony LaFauce, it will not end up in the realm of dancing hamsters and flying toasters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The auto click will arrive, but with hast Maggy. An intuitive thought sends "Flashes" of user preference by default to halt the auto load, otherwise where used with Facebook Pages. Isn't this already happening? Or are we all falling short envisioning Facebooks subtle enhancements and handling of web-technological biases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Micahael White, I think that Flash does not enclose the user into a little dead-end world (to be frank) I feel that there is no reason why any links within a page can not be integrated into a Flash application. Look at it like this, if you are travelling along a highway and stop at a Flashy garage to refuel; restock, be informed, entertained, overwhelmed and enlightened. Well - you're in your own little world, well at least until you get back onto the highway. It's not a moment of, I only want - and don't want this - or that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is a little biased, and with Facebooks new and improved use of autoloading regarding Flash, that garage is open if you want it to be, when you want it to be, and where you want it to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any web-based technology implemented with thought and experience is well delivered. Flash provides a well entwined method to distribute amazing visuals, integrated server-side benefits and compelling user experiences.</p>
<p>Auto-loading any content should be the choice of the end-user, consumer and well thought out by the developers providing the infrastructure by which Flash &amp; Facebook will integrate and deliver additional rich content to Facebook users.</p>
<p>All businesses want their consumers to experience compelling user-experiences. In this case Flash implemented with thought and experience will do this and Anthony LaFauce, it will not end up in the realm of dancing hamsters and flying toasters.</p>
<p>The auto click will arrive, but with hast Maggy. An intuitive thought sends &#8220;Flashes&#8221; of user preference by default to halt the auto load, otherwise where used with Facebook Pages. Isn&#8217;t this already happening? Or are we all falling short envisioning Facebooks subtle enhancements and handling of web-technological biases.</p>
<p>Micahael White, I think that Flash does not enclose the user into a little dead-end world (to be frank) I feel that there is no reason why any links within a page can not be integrated into a Flash application. Look at it like this, if you are travelling along a highway and stop at a Flashy garage to refuel; restock, be informed, entertained, overwhelmed and enlightened. Well - you&#8217;re in your own little world, well at least until you get back onto the highway. It&#8217;s not a moment of, I only want - and don&#8217;t want this - or that.</p>
<p>That is a little biased, and with Facebooks new and improved use of autoloading regarding Flash, that garage is open if you want it to be, when you want it to be, and where you want it to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-7700</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-7700</guid>
		<description>I somehow suspect that autoload will come. And how are businesses defined ? On MySpace, everyone seems to be selling something. How long before large numbers of users complain that they're excluded from putting these apps. on their profiles - same rules for all?
The crux about Flash is that it's great, but only when tastefully used &#38; in a limited way. Flash everywhere is a big put-off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somehow suspect that autoload will come. And how are businesses defined ? On MySpace, everyone seems to be selling something. How long before large numbers of users complain that they&#8217;re excluded from putting these apps. on their profiles - same rules for all?<br />
The crux about Flash is that it&#8217;s great, but only when tastefully used &amp; in a limited way. Flash everywhere is a big put-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-12409</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/02/facebook-adds-flash-am-i-excited/#comment-12409</guid>
		<description>I somehow suspect that autoload will come. And how are businesses defined ? On MySpace, everyone seems to be selling something. How long before large numbers of users complain that they're excluded from putting these apps. on their profiles - same rules for all?&lt;br&gt;The crux about Flash is that it's great, but only when tastefully used &#38; in a limited way. Flash everywhere is a big put-off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somehow suspect that autoload will come. And how are businesses defined ? On MySpace, everyone seems to be selling something. How long before large numbers of users complain that they&#8217;re excluded from putting these apps. on their profiles - same rules for all?<br />The crux about Flash is that it&#8217;s great, but only when tastefully used &amp; in a limited way. Flash everywhere is a big put-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
