Comments on: Valleywag Gets it Wrong http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/ The Unofficial Facebook Blog - Facebook News and More! Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:01:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: 113.com http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5746 113.com Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:50:18 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5746 Well then it's quite unfortunate :-| Well then it’s quite unfortunate :-|

]]> By: 113.com http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12973 113.com Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:50:18 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12973 Well then it's quite unfortunate :-| Well then it’s quite unfortunate :-|

]]> By: Ollie http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5732 Ollie Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:09:32 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5732 113 - if the boss were managing a social enterprise, then yes. That's not the case here though. 113 - if the boss were managing a social enterprise, then yes. That’s not the case here though.

]]> By: Ollie http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12972 Ollie Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:09:32 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12972 113 - if the boss were managing a social enterprise, then yes. That's not the case here though. 113 - if the boss were managing a social enterprise, then yes. That’s not the case here though.

]]> By: Matt Huggins http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5718 Matt Huggins Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:51:39 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5718 Thanks Dan...I have AllFacebook in my feed reader, but I wasn't sure which article referenced ValleyWag Thanks Dan…I have AllFacebook in my feed reader, but I wasn’t sure which article referenced ValleyWag

]]> By: Matt Huggins http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12971 Matt Huggins Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:51:39 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12971 Thanks Dan...I have AllFacebook in my feed reader, but I wasn't sure which article referenced ValleyWag Thanks Dan…I have AllFacebook in my feed reader, but I wasn’t sure which article referenced ValleyWag

]]> By: 113.com http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5705 113.com Sun, 09 Dec 2007 12:22:49 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5705 True or otherwise, the act is purely reasonable, acceptable, and expected. Boss is boss. Staff is staff. What the staff might be thinking? Do you think the boss (any boss) would <b>really</b> care? True or otherwise, the act is purely reasonable, acceptable, and expected.

Boss is boss. Staff is staff. What the staff might be thinking? Do you think the boss (any boss) would really care?

]]> By: Dan Lester http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5704 Dan Lester Sun, 09 Dec 2007 12:05:08 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-5704 Matt, if you haven't been following every single word Nick has written - unlikely, I know - he was referring to his previous article: http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/zuckerberg-sells-40-million-of-stock/ It seemed perfectly believable, but did leave us wondering what the rest of the Facebook staff might be thinking... Matt, if you haven’t been following every single word Nick has written - unlikely, I know - he was referring to his previous article:

http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/zuckerberg-sells-40-million-of-stock/

It seemed perfectly believable, but did leave us wondering what the rest of the Facebook staff might be thinking…

]]> By: 113.com http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12970 113.com Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:22:49 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12970 True or otherwise, the act is purely reasonable, acceptable, and expected.<br><br>Boss is boss. Staff is staff. What the staff might be thinking? Do you think the boss (any boss) would <b>really</b> care? True or otherwise, the act is purely reasonable, acceptable, and expected.

Boss is boss. Staff is staff. What the staff might be thinking? Do you think the boss (any boss) would really care?

]]> By: Dan Lester http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12969 Dan Lester Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:05:08 +0000 http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/valleywag-gets-it-wrong-2/#comment-12969 Matt, if you haven't been following every single word Nick has written - unlikely, I know - he was referring to his previous article:<br><br><a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/zuckerberg-sells-40-million-of-stock/">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/zuckerberg-s...</a><br><br>It seemed perfectly believable, but did leave us wondering what the rest of the Facebook staff might be thinking... Matt, if you haven’t been following every single word Nick has written - unlikely, I know - he was referring to his previous article:

http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/zuckerberg-s...

It seemed perfectly believable, but did leave us wondering what the rest of the Facebook staff might be thinking…

]]>