<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Users Won&#8217;t Pay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Facebook Blog - Facebook News and More!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chi-chi Ekweozor</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-4568</link>
		<dc:creator>Chi-chi Ekweozor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-4568</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this, Nick.

I wrote an open letter to Facebook here about this on Saturday:

http://tinyurl.com/yvxurx

Cool to see it's someoneâ€™s asking the question, at least.

@Joe Grossberg:
Agreed, 4% may not be much but it's still a guaranteed revenue stream...

@Chris Kennedy:
I agree, I don't think the sample is representative.  

I'm willing to bet I'm not in the demographic covered by that poll, not being a student and all that.

Perhaps the poll should be re-run and targeted towards the â€˜Facebook-is-the-new-Linked-Inâ€™ crowd.  

Would be interesting to see what busy, middle manager types think of receiving and inadvertently sending social ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this, Nick.</p>
<p>I wrote an open letter to Facebook here about this on Saturday:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/yvxurx" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yvxurx</a></p>
<p>Cool to see it&#8217;s someoneâ€™s asking the question, at least.</p>
<p>@Joe Grossberg:<br />
Agreed, 4% may not be much but it&#8217;s still a guaranteed revenue stream&#8230;</p>
<p>@Chris Kennedy:<br />
I agree, I don&#8217;t think the sample is representative.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m willing to bet I&#8217;m not in the demographic covered by that poll, not being a student and all that.</p>
<p>Perhaps the poll should be re-run and targeted towards the â€˜Facebook-is-the-new-Linked-Inâ€™ crowd.  </p>
<p>Would be interesting to see what busy, middle manager types think of receiving and inadvertently sending social ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chi-chi Ekweozor</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-13989</link>
		<dc:creator>Chi-chi Ekweozor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-13989</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this, Nick.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wrote an open letter to Facebook here about this on Saturday:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/yvxurx"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/yvxurx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cool to see it's someoneâ€™s asking the question, at least.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Joe Grossberg:&lt;br&gt;Agreed, 4% may not be much but it's still a guaranteed revenue stream...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Chris Kennedy:&lt;br&gt;I agree, I don't think the sample is representative.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm willing to bet I'm not in the demographic covered by that poll, not being a student and all that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps the poll should be re-run and targeted towards the â€˜Facebook-is-the-new-Linked-Inâ€™ crowd.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would be interesting to see what busy, middle manager types think of receiving and inadvertently sending social ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this, Nick.</p>
<p>I wrote an open letter to Facebook here about this on Saturday:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/yvxurx">http://tinyurl.com/yvxurx</a></p>
<p>Cool to see it&#8217;s someoneâ€™s asking the question, at least.</p>
<p>@Joe Grossberg:<br />Agreed, 4% may not be much but it&#8217;s still a guaranteed revenue stream&#8230;</p>
<p>@Chris Kennedy:<br />I agree, I don&#8217;t think the sample is representative.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m willing to bet I&#8217;m not in the demographic covered by that poll, not being a student and all that.</p>
<p>Perhaps the poll should be re-run and targeted towards the â€˜Facebook-is-the-new-Linked-Inâ€™ crowd.  </p>
<p>Would be interesting to see what busy, middle manager types think of receiving and inadvertently sending social ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Grossberg</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-4476</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Grossberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-4476</guid>
		<description>Nick:

Whatever ... $50/year from 4% of Facebook users is still a lot of revenue -- $100M a year and growing rapidly, if you accept the 50M member estimate.

And that's on top of any ad revenue.

Dan:

I love ABP, but it only works if there is a pattern to the ad filenames. If FB is smart, and cares about the tiny number of people who use FF and ABP, they'll put all their advertising images in http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/ and use random filenames.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick:</p>
<p>Whatever &#8230; $50/year from 4% of Facebook users is still a lot of revenue &#8212; $100M a year and growing rapidly, if you accept the 50M member estimate.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s on top of any ad revenue.</p>
<p>Dan:</p>
<p>I love ABP, but it only works if there is a pattern to the ad filenames. If FB is smart, and cares about the tiny number of people who use FF and ABP, they&#8217;ll put all their advertising images in <a href="http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/" rel="nofollow">http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/</a> and use random filenames.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-4474</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-4474</guid>
		<description>In terms of pure sampling error, the margin of error for that poll at 250 people is +/- 2.7%, and +/- 1.4% if 1,000 people were sampled. What would be more interesting is to see the demographic breakdowns so that they could understand which users were more likely to pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of pure sampling error, the margin of error for that poll at 250 people is +/- 2.7%, and +/- 1.4% if 1,000 people were sampled. What would be more interesting is to see the demographic breakdowns so that they could understand which users were more likely to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Grossberg</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-13988</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Grossberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-13988</guid>
		<description>Nick:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever ... $50/year from 4% of Facebook users is still a lot of revenue -- $100M a year and growing rapidly, if you accept the 50M member estimate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that's on top of any ad revenue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dan:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love ABP, but it only works if there is a pattern to the ad filenames. If FB is smart, and cares about the tiny number of people who use FF and ABP, they'll put all their advertising images in &lt;a href="http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/"&gt;http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/&lt;/a&gt; and use random filenames.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick:</p>
<p>Whatever &#8230; $50/year from 4% of Facebook users is still a lot of revenue &#8212; $100M a year and growing rapidly, if you accept the 50M member estimate.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s on top of any ad revenue.</p>
<p>Dan:</p>
<p>I love ABP, but it only works if there is a pattern to the ad filenames. If FB is smart, and cares about the tiny number of people who use FF and ABP, they&#8217;ll put all their advertising images in <a href="http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/">http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/</a> and use random filenames.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-13987</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-13987</guid>
		<description>In terms of pure sampling error, the margin of error for that poll at 250 people is +/- 2.7%, and +/- 1.4% if 1,000 people were sampled. What would be more interesting is to see the demographic breakdowns so that they could understand which users were more likely to pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of pure sampling error, the margin of error for that poll at 250 people is +/- 2.7%, and +/- 1.4% if 1,000 people were sampled. What would be more interesting is to see the demographic breakdowns so that they could understand which users were more likely to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-4470</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-4470</guid>
		<description>I already have an ad-free Facebook, and I don't have to pay for it.

In the days of Adblock Plus, it's silly to have a subscriber version that ONLY removes the ads. There must be some other value-added feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already have an ad-free Facebook, and I don&#8217;t have to pay for it.</p>
<p>In the days of Adblock Plus, it&#8217;s silly to have a subscriber version that ONLY removes the ads. There must be some other value-added feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-13986</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/11/facebook-users-wont-pay/#comment-13986</guid>
		<description>I already have an ad-free Facebook, and I don't have to pay for it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the days of Adblock Plus, it's silly to have a subscriber version that ONLY removes the ads. There must be some other value-added feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already have an ad-free Facebook, and I don&#8217;t have to pay for it.</p>
<p>In the days of Adblock Plus, it&#8217;s silly to have a subscriber version that ONLY removes the ads. There must be some other value-added feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
