Facebook Users Won’t Pay
Posted by Nick O'Neill on November 13th, 2007 9:46 AMMy friend Dan Peguine sent me a screenshot of an interesting sponsored poll he saw last night. The question posed to the survey recipients was “Would you pay $3.99 a month to not ever see ads on Facebook?” A whopping 95% said no and 4% responded yes. This compares to statistics that Marshall Kirkpatrick published last night suggesting that 11% of YouTube users would be willing to pay for an adless version of YouTube.
You could argue that this survey was flawed given that the question didn’t simply ask if users would pay, it asked a specific amount. Thus, had you switched the monthly amount to $1.99 the numbers could have been significantly different. Additionally, sponsored polls are asked to between 250 and 1000 users. Depending on the number asked, the polls could be statistically irrelevant. I was going to attempt to create a different poll with a more objective question but I didn’t feel like spending $250 just to test out my theory.
Personally, at present Facebook ads are not extremely invasive. If Facebook decides to increase their advertising levels to be similar to MySpace, my opinion might rapidly change. Would you pay for an adfree version of Facebook?
(4.64 out of 5)
(4.17 out of 5)
Add New Comment
Viewing 4 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
In the days of Adblock Plus, it's silly to have a subscriber version that ONLY removes the ads. There must be some other value-added feature.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Whatever ... $50/year from 4% of Facebook users is still a lot of revenue -- $100M a year and growing rapidly, if you accept the 50M member estimate.
And that's on top of any ad revenue.
Dan:
I love ABP, but it only works if there is a pattern to the ad filenames. If FB is smart, and cares about the tiny number of people who use FF and ABP, they'll put all their advertising images in http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/ and use random filenames.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I wrote an open letter to Facebook here about this on Saturday:
http://tinyurl.com/yvxurx
Cool to see it's someone’s asking the question, at least.
@Joe Grossberg:
Agreed, 4% may not be much but it's still a guaranteed revenue stream...
@Chris Kennedy:
I agree, I don't think the sample is representative.
I'm willing to bet I'm not in the demographic covered by that poll, not being a student and all that.
Perhaps the poll should be re-run and targeted towards the ‘Facebook-is-the-new-Linked-In’ crowd.
Would be interesting to see what busy, middle manager types think of receiving and inadvertently sending social ads.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks