<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Facebook Kool-Aid is Really Sweet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Facebook Blog - Facebook News and More!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Face Book is the new AOL/You can not fight the internet

 

Currently most Social Networking sites create closed silos of user information and content that cannot be easily shared, reused, or redistributed outside of the network. FaceBook is a closed Silo. Myspace is a closed Silo.A Facebook member cannot export their Profile to Myspace. A Myspace member cannot export their profile to FaceBook. This is not because their is no technical way to export member profiles; its because both companies want to lock users into the Myspace and Facebook silos.

The Facebook "Open" platform is not only a gimmick it is also an Orwellian attempt to hi jack and redefine the term "Open" I think that may "Open" source proponents would agree that "Open" when it refers to software applications at the very least means inter operable. FaceBook is not interpretable. Myspace is not inter operable. From today onwards it is my hope that those reporting on and covering FaceBook will no longer use the term "Open" to describe the FaceBook platform.


The Data and content that members own cannot be easily exported out, or used with many other existing internet applications. The flow of data and information is one way. The Open platform is in fact open for developers, but closed to the rest of the internet. A one way vacum of application development that can never expand to any users base other than Facebook. FaceBook is a "Closed" platform much the way that Microsoft is a closed Platform. Develop for Microsoft and your application will be dependent on Microsoft technology and will not easily port to any other platfrom. Develop for FaceBook and your application will not work on any other platform. By developing applications for either you have limited the possible amount of networks that can distribute and use your application.



AOL at one time was also the darling of the internet. A big fat closed platform that attempted to lock in users. While AOL had quit a run; it was only a matter of time before users understood that AOL was not the internet. That there were millions, and millions of other networks to participate in. Once the hole of reality was opened and members realized that they were free to go beyond the AOL wall; the flow of members leaving the silo could not be stopped. It will be the same for FaceBook.

The arrogance of attempting to redefine and close in that which cannot be defined or captured can only lead to a steady fall and ultimate humiliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face Book is the new AOL/You can not fight the internet</p>
<p>Currently most Social Networking sites create closed silos of user information and content that cannot be easily shared, reused, or redistributed outside of the network. FaceBook is a closed Silo. Myspace is a closed Silo.A Facebook member cannot export their Profile to Myspace. A Myspace member cannot export their profile to FaceBook. This is not because their is no technical way to export member profiles; its because both companies want to lock users into the Myspace and Facebook silos.</p>
<p>The Facebook &#8220;Open&#8221; platform is not only a gimmick it is also an Orwellian attempt to hi jack and redefine the term &#8220;Open&#8221; I think that may &#8220;Open&#8221; source proponents would agree that &#8220;Open&#8221; when it refers to software applications at the very least means inter operable. FaceBook is not interpretable. Myspace is not inter operable. From today onwards it is my hope that those reporting on and covering FaceBook will no longer use the term &#8220;Open&#8221; to describe the FaceBook platform.</p>
<p>The Data and content that members own cannot be easily exported out, or used with many other existing internet applications. The flow of data and information is one way. The Open platform is in fact open for developers, but closed to the rest of the internet. A one way vacum of application development that can never expand to any users base other than Facebook. FaceBook is a &#8220;Closed&#8221; platform much the way that Microsoft is a closed Platform. Develop for Microsoft and your application will be dependent on Microsoft technology and will not easily port to any other platfrom. Develop for FaceBook and your application will not work on any other platform. By developing applications for either you have limited the possible amount of networks that can distribute and use your application.</p>
<p>AOL at one time was also the darling of the internet. A big fat closed platform that attempted to lock in users. While AOL had quit a run; it was only a matter of time before users understood that AOL was not the internet. That there were millions, and millions of other networks to participate in. Once the hole of reality was opened and members realized that they were free to go beyond the AOL wall; the flow of members leaving the silo could not be stopped. It will be the same for FaceBook.</p>
<p>The arrogance of attempting to redefine and close in that which cannot be defined or captured can only lead to a steady fall and ultimate humiliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/#comment-15014</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/#comment-15014</guid>
		<description>Face Book is the new AOL/You can not fight the internet&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Currently most Social Networking sites create closed silos of user information and content that cannot be easily shared, reused, or redistributed outside of the network. FaceBook is a closed Silo. Myspace is a closed Silo.A Facebook member cannot export their Profile to Myspace. A Myspace member cannot export their profile to FaceBook. This is not because their is no technical way to export member profiles; its because both companies want to lock users into the Myspace and Facebook silos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Facebook "Open" platform is not only a gimmick it is also an Orwellian attempt to hi jack and redefine the term "Open" I think that may "Open" source proponents would agree that "Open" when it refers to software applications at the very least means inter operable. FaceBook is not interpretable. Myspace is not inter operable. From today onwards it is my hope that those reporting on and covering FaceBook will no longer use the term "Open" to describe the FaceBook platform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Data and content that members own cannot be easily exported out, or used with many other existing internet applications. The flow of data and information is one way. The Open platform is in fact open for developers, but closed to the rest of the internet. A one way vacum of application development that can never expand to any users base other than Facebook. FaceBook is a "Closed" platform much the way that Microsoft is a closed Platform. Develop for Microsoft and your application will be dependent on Microsoft technology and will not easily port to any other platfrom. Develop for FaceBook and your application will not work on any other platform. By developing applications for either you have limited the possible amount of networks that can distribute and use your application.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AOL at one time was also the darling of the internet. A big fat closed platform that attempted to lock in users. While AOL had quit a run; it was only a matter of time before users understood that AOL was not the internet. That there were millions, and millions of other networks to participate in. Once the hole of reality was opened and members realized that they were free to go beyond the AOL wall; the flow of members leaving the silo could not be stopped. It will be the same for FaceBook.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The arrogance of attempting to redefine and close in that which cannot be defined or captured can only lead to a steady fall and ultimate humiliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face Book is the new AOL/You can not fight the internet</p>
<p>Currently most Social Networking sites create closed silos of user information and content that cannot be easily shared, reused, or redistributed outside of the network. FaceBook is a closed Silo. Myspace is a closed Silo.A Facebook member cannot export their Profile to Myspace. A Myspace member cannot export their profile to FaceBook. This is not because their is no technical way to export member profiles; its because both companies want to lock users into the Myspace and Facebook silos.</p>
<p>The Facebook &#8220;Open&#8221; platform is not only a gimmick it is also an Orwellian attempt to hi jack and redefine the term &#8220;Open&#8221; I think that may &#8220;Open&#8221; source proponents would agree that &#8220;Open&#8221; when it refers to software applications at the very least means inter operable. FaceBook is not interpretable. Myspace is not inter operable. From today onwards it is my hope that those reporting on and covering FaceBook will no longer use the term &#8220;Open&#8221; to describe the FaceBook platform.</p>
<p>The Data and content that members own cannot be easily exported out, or used with many other existing internet applications. The flow of data and information is one way. The Open platform is in fact open for developers, but closed to the rest of the internet. A one way vacum of application development that can never expand to any users base other than Facebook. FaceBook is a &#8220;Closed&#8221; platform much the way that Microsoft is a closed Platform. Develop for Microsoft and your application will be dependent on Microsoft technology and will not easily port to any other platfrom. Develop for FaceBook and your application will not work on any other platform. By developing applications for either you have limited the possible amount of networks that can distribute and use your application.</p>
<p>AOL at one time was also the darling of the internet. A big fat closed platform that attempted to lock in users. While AOL had quit a run; it was only a matter of time before users understood that AOL was not the internet. That there were millions, and millions of other networks to participate in. Once the hole of reality was opened and members realized that they were free to go beyond the AOL wall; the flow of members leaving the silo could not be stopped. It will be the same for FaceBook.</p>
<p>The arrogance of attempting to redefine and close in that which cannot be defined or captured can only lead to a steady fall and ultimate humiliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fit method</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>fit method</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Yea,
but facebook is also dangerous.  The more contacts that you have on there the more vigilant you have to be that there isn't any scandolous material of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea,<br />
but facebook is also dangerous.  The more contacts that you have on there the more vigilant you have to be that there isn&#8217;t any scandolous material of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fit method</title>
		<link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/#comment-15013</link>
		<dc:creator>fit method</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/07/the-facebook-kool-aid-is-really-sweet/#comment-15013</guid>
		<description>Yea,&lt;br&gt;but facebook is also dangerous.  The more contacts that you have on there the more vigilant you have to be that there isn&#39;t any scandolous material of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea,<br />but facebook is also dangerous.  The more contacts that you have on there the more vigilant you have to be that there isn&#39;t any scandolous material of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
